Pastor’s Message September 16th, 2018

In my multi-part series of ongoing responses to the sex abuse crisis in the Church, I offer another point-of-view this week, primarily from a psychological perspective.
According to leading psychologists and experts, misconceptions people may have about sexual abuse, sexual harassment and homosexuality as elements of the abuse crisis in the Catholic Church can hinder efforts to address it. The complex nature of each of the elements can make it hard for the average “Catholic in the pew” to understand the differences among them, delaying the formulation of good solutions. Though many may blame the abuse scandals strictly on a homosexuality problem among the clergy, same-sex attraction doesn’t make priests more likely to sexually abuse children. It’s perfectly understandable that people could be confused by this, because we know that 80% or more of the clerical sexual abuse victims are boys. So, some people might conclude that if you get rid of homosexuals in the clergy, then you’ve got the problem solved; it doesn’t work that way.
But, most of the clerical sexual abuse perpetrators have been “situational generalists,” a term used throughout extensive John Jay College of Criminal Justice summary reports, (the most recent in 2011), to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). These do not have a specific sexual preference for youth, but instead turn to children as a sort of “substitute” due to psychological and emotional difficulties in bonding with peers. Such individuals – who often exhibit issues with substance abuse and impulse control — can’t really develop successful, negotiated, intimate relationships with adults, according to Dr. Thomas Plante, a celebrated psychologist, who recently served as vice chair of the USCCB’s National Review Board for the Protection of Children and Youth.
Since generalists seek readily available victims, boys have historically — though by no means exclusively — been a target for many clerical abusers. For understandable reasons, priests often have had access to, and trust with boys, much more so than girls. This proximity has led to the erroneous conclusion of a correlation between homosexuality and clerical abuse.
Historically, child sexual abuse has occurred in the Church and in human society since the dawn of time. St. Basil decried the problem back in the fourth century. The classic pedophile is attracted to young, prepubescent children. Prepubescence is typically defined as less than age 11. Only a small number of abusive priests – and of sexual abusers in the general population – can be formally classified as pedophiles, according to the clinical definition used by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in its “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM),” the authoritative guide used by mental health professionals worldwide.
Dr. Plante also says that “the vast majority of sex offenders are regular men, often married or partnered, with 80 percent or more victimizing their own family members.” Overall, men are far more likely than women to become abusers, which helps to explain the comparatively lower rates of abuse perpetrated by female religious. This striking gap between the genders – with “90 to 95 percent” of perpetrators being male – is generally due to basic differences in the psychological makeup of the sexes.
Plante also stressed that sexual harassment, perpetrated by a number of clerical superiors against seminarians, should be distinguished from child sexual abuse. Both involve power and sexual violation, but they are different. “Sexually harassing people at the workplace is not a sexual psychiatric disorder. It could be a personality disorder; it could be a variety of things, but it’s not a sexual disorder. Every industry, every organization has a problem with this issue, where people abuse power and sexually harass their subordinates.”
In the United States, incidents of clerical sexual abuse rose during the 1960s and 1970s, paralleling a society-wide increase in other problematic behaviors such as substance abuse and sexual experimentation. By the early 1980s, the number of cases began to level off, due in part to increased research, mandated reporting, awareness and intervention strategies. Because the traumatic nature of child sexual abuse tends to prevent victims from disclosing their attacks until years later, recent legal investigations do not always reflect current levels of clerical abuse, which have declined significantly. Dr. Plante stated, “I think the average person on the street thinks this is rampant today in 2018, when it’s not,” adding that annual data collections, independent audits, safe environment training and zero-tolerance policies have proven effective. Although ongoing vigilance is required, Plante is hopeful about the Catholic Church’s ongoing prospects for protecting youth from clerical sexual abuse. “I think we are using best practices now,” he said. “Sadly, we can’t change what happened 30, 40, 50 years ago, and we treat those victims with great compassion and respect. But thankfully for everybody, today’s Church is very different from yesterday’s Church.”